Sunday, June 17, 2012
in which our heroine tries to find something to watch during summer hiatus
There are Buddhas, and it’s Washington D.C., so this is a museum, or some post-apocalyptic version of the future where the Chinese took over and then rediscovered religion. There’s a pretty brunette woman who has big, awkward eyes and wordlessly identifies with a misfit of a middle schooler, so she’s probably smart and socially awkward in spite of her obvious beauty.
There’s a man of mystery sleeping with a blonde woman who doesn’t know what he does for a living. I bet he gets along really well with serious brunette girl.
A lab tech got blood on an ancient artifact. I’m sure this will work out well for everyone.
Back to the blonde, she makes a snide comment about the Secret Service to a man who won’t tell her what he does for a living, which in T.V. land is akin to bitching about the hard-ass boss that no one has ever seen to the conspicuously laid back dude who for some reason is allowed to lounge around the office with impunity.
Oh look, playboy and brunette don’t get along! Called it!
Brunette’s name is Micah, or something phonetically similar. One of the many biblical boys’ names that sounds like a girl’s name, Cf. Elisha.
Male ethnic nameless Secret Service agent, you’re dead.
Yep. Dead.
Playboy plays it fast, and plays it loose, and in the end is gonna get burned. Either that or Sterling Archer is going to blow his cover.
Are inner thigh holsters really a thing?
Supernatural things are happening!
Roommate: “Well, his life is ruined; he might as well have been shot [by brunette].”
Me: “Yes, well, at least [brunette] won’t have to fill out endless paperwork.”
Mystery black woman, burly Asian guy, and Playboy. This scene is so ethnically diverse! Aw, Playboy has no human attachments. Poor good-looking, highly skilled white man.
Brunette: “What am I doing here?”
Roommate: “What is she doing there?”
Me: “She has to balance out his seat-of-the-pants, fly-by-night attitude with her bookish adherence to rules and protocols, which is how she succeeded in a man’s world in the first place. Also, sexual tension.”
Jane Espenson!
Brunette is an entitled brat. I hate her. She probably went to Choate. She has a Choate neck.
Playboy asks the only intelligent question of the entire scene: “What am I supposed to do here?”
Brunette is dismissive of small-town America. Her new name is Choate Neck. She’s also insensitive to her partner’s alcoholism!
Playboy went to Dartmouth. His new name is Dartmouth!
Oh, Choate Neck has daddy issues. Shocker.
My inner hipster wants, nay, demands a old-timey typewriter computer keyboard.
Choate Neck is dismissive of domestic violence. Hate. Her.
Choate Neck is also terrible at interacting with suspects, or, you know, human beings of any kind in any situation at all, ever.
Defense attorney deflects question with snark, and Choate Neck takes exception: “That was a serious question!” Oh, so now you wanna take things seriously?!
If I worked alone in a warehouse with a zip line, I would do that all day long.
Choate Neck’s dead lebensborn lover calls her “Bunny,” and if that doesn’t scream “Choate!” I don’t know what does.
WTF is a “Renaissance blowout?”
OK, it’s apparently a bonfire party surrounded by classical columns and a few people dressed in community-theater grade Renaissance garb.
Well, that was acceptable. I'll probably watch that again.
Thursday, April 5, 2012
in transit
Friday, January 27, 2012
at the speed of light
In other internet news, here is a real conversation:
mikaydee: "wtf is Kingdoms of Amalur? I thought it was a Facebook game."
RM: "I still have no idea."
***
48 hours and one Penny Arcade news post later
***
mikaydee: "So, we have to get Kingdoms of Amalur, right?"
RM: "Oh, absolutely."
Yeah, I'll do pretty much whatever those guys tell me.
Monday, January 23, 2012
in which our heroine finds herself writing about gender issues again
(hot guys)
Monday, December 19, 2011
gender bending over backwards, part deux
CB: This man is hysterical.
mikaydee: Like, funny hysterical, or driven insane by a uterus hysterical?
CB: Like totally sobbing.
mikaydee: Ah, so, both.
(2) Revelation:
"You're cute when you're angry" is a really just a thing that men say as an excuse to continue making me angry. Oh, am I pissing you off? Well, it makes you more attractive, so that makes it okay, right? No! Hells no! I'm cute when I'm angry? Am I also sexy when I'm crying? That is totally effed up.
Monday, December 5, 2011
in which our heroine confesses her sins
RM: oh jesus
RM: taste just rolled over in its grave
mikaydee: In my defense, the context is almost always "What?! Rose McGowan would never be in this piece of--...oh wait, Rose McGowan would."
Sunday, November 6, 2011
appropos of nothing
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
in partial praise of neologisms
Tuesday, August 30, 2011
in which our heroine weighs in
"Also, for all you world famous nerds out there: Don’t go after two Gawker Media employees and not expect to have a post written about you. We live for this kind of stuff."
Are you kidding me?
On behalf of all the serious professional women out there, let me say this: gentleman, you absolutely can, you absolutely should go out on dates with women and not just assume that they are going to use you to their professional advantage. Women who do that are evil. Don't touch them; you don't know where they've been.
As I've said elsewhere, there's a word for women who go out on dates for professional, rather than personal reasons.
....
"Whore." The word is "whore."
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
in which our heroine wishes she were silicon-based
Wednesday, August 10, 2011
in which our heroine cuts herself with occam's razor
Friday, August 5, 2011
rosencrantz and guildenstern are wizards
Now, granted, a lot of these monsters logically could not exist. But it's magic, right? Wizards did it. This monster, though, is special, and by special, I mean enraging. It offends me not as a gamer, but as a sentient being. This monster ontologically could not exist, which is a little, you know, beyond. It has roughly human intelligence but no conception of death? WTF, indeed! How can you have self-awareness and not have a conception of death? If you understand that you exist, how does that not also imply the opposite possibility, that you don't necessarily have to exist? You exist, and unless you're YHWH (and if you're reading this and You're YHWH, well, I'm either incredibly flattered or utterly unsurprised), you know you haven't always existed, and so one day a little later maybe you won't exist, and BAM, conception of death, embedded in the conception of life. As far as basic concepts go, you don't get much more basic than that. It's as if you said "this monster is capable of learning to add, but not subtract." Eff you, monster. Eff you and your impossible thoughts. You don't understand death? Here, my +1 scimitar of intellectual fury will teach you....
Sunday, July 3, 2011
stray thoughts on bad movies: transformers: dark of the moon edition
(2) Why does Patrick Dempsey care if the Decepticons take prisoners or not?
(3) Did Optimus Prime just execute someone who was starting to beg for his life? I think he did.
Wednesday, January 26, 2011
in which our heroine engages in some peer review
Thursday, January 20, 2011
the persistence of memory
I'd had a little Rage Tea(TM) today when I got to Starbucks for a much-needed post-conference-call sugar shock, and I was reminded of another thing that used to bother a more vibrant, more vital version of me: the Barista Who Thinks You Are Friends. She knows your name! (Well, she knows the Anglo-Frankish version of it.) She remembers that you work in the area! (Or has deduced this from the fact that you're wearing a suit and pumps.) Most of all, she remembers your drink. Except that she doesn't. She has perhaps mixed you up with another person of your gender and ethnicity, but you've never actually ordered that particular proportion of caffeine, sugar syrup, and milk fat that she is currently conjuring onto the side of the white paper cup. So you have to interrupt her tellingly efficient demonstration of intimacy (because really, all this treacle is meant to keep you moving as quickly as possible through the line and out the door before you realize that all this Old World bonhomie is essentially the carcass of a sheep draped grotesquely over the wolf who devoured it). You have to tell her that, in conscious betrayal of all you've been through together, you want to order something else. And for no good reason, you are embarrassed by this. They have tricked you into being ashamed of offering them money in exchange for the thing that you want.
The smartest thing I ever read about Starbucks comes from a Slate.com article by Jacob Weisberg: "The unappreciated business genius of Starbucks is not charging $4 for a latte but rather giving adults permission to drink milkshakes, on the pretext that they are merely tea or coffee." The baristas' drink-memorization gambit reinforces this notion, that an upside-down caramel macchiato with whip cream and chocolate sprinkles is just the way you take your coffee, in the same way that someone else might have it black with two sugars. Rather than a liquified candy snack (presaging a wider movement away from solid food), it is something that you can reasonably be expected to drink every morning and not tire of; it is a 300-calorie part of your routine, and therefore your identity. And changing that, suddenly and without warning, is a betrayal. It's a betrayal of yourself, and a betrayal of your friend, the barista.
Sunday, January 9, 2011
aproposition
Wednesday, January 5, 2011
oxymoronic
*Apparently Blogspot's spell-check doesn't recognize the word "Blogspot," which, ya know, it coined. Similarly, Facebook's spell-check doesn't recognize the word "Facebook."
**This is really a silly way to recreate someone's personality. Think of all the web applications you share, or all the things you've purchased online for other people. If someone tried to do this to me based on my Amazon and Netflix accounts, they might very well end up with a marathon-running homosexual man who really, really likes children's art supplies.
Saturday, July 3, 2010
momentum momentous
At some point, the dominant narrative coming out of E3 became something like "normal people are going to love this new motion sensor crap; hardcore gamers are just being haters because they are fat slobs who disdain movement and sweating."
The thing is, I already do lots of flailing and sweating...at the gym. When I come home from the gym, I want to shoot Nazi zombies in the face while splayed upon the couch in a digitally-induced stupor. If Sony, Nintendo, or Microsoft could design a discrete, spill-proof bedpan and a robot to feed me grapes during loading screens, now that would seriously improve my gaming experience. And it's not as though home video game exercise is going to replace real exercise, which requires sufficient space and/or equipment, and more importantly, movements that have little if anything to do with video game actions. It's not as if I can get a Kinect and then suddenly cancel my gym membership. Gaming is a certain kind of experience and exercise is a certain kind of experience, and while combining them can be fun in certain, limited situations (Wii tennis) it will usually be a dilution of both. They already sell televisions welded to exercise equipment, and it certainly hasn't revolutionized how most people watch TV. I'm doubtful, too, that it has resulted in more people exercising.
In short, if a first-person shooter ever tries to make me actually run to shoot something, I will punch it in the face, pick up a Tom Clancy novel, and crawl into bed.
Monday, June 14, 2010
stray thoughts on bad movies: The A Team
2. B.A. Baracus isn't just a magical black man; he has a magical black van that materializes in the desert when the white guys need rescuing, and then is promptly destroyed for a cheap emotional beat as soon as they no longer need it.
3. In two separate scenes, fake dramatic tension is created by the characters' inexplicable refusal to simply move laterally out of harm's way. Nothing is preventing them from moving laterally except the movie's need for them to almost die so that we will have a reason in Hell to care about what happens to them.
4. Movies like these (dubbed "radtarded" by AS) often find me rooting for the villain because, due to poor plotting, he is usually the smartest person on screen. His victories come from considerable effort on his part and not from things magically occurring to his benefit. Heroes are much more likely to get undeservedly lucky because the movie needs them to succeed, but no one could be bothered to figure out why exactly they would.
5. This movie had eleven writers.
Sunday, June 13, 2010
stray thoughts on bad movies: Sex and the City 2
2. The Prestons' Great Recession Horror Story is to have moved from the palatial penthouse suite into a more modestly mansion-like apartment twelve floors down. The camera shots are designed to show us the thrifty narrowness of their fifty bajillion damask-draped rooms. Not for the last time, I find myself thinking this is sort of what Versailles looked like, before the pitchforks and beheadings. Of course, they still keep Carrie's old apartment, which essentially functions as her (second) giant walk-in closet. Like ya do.
3. This is a movie about Americans traveling in the Middle East, and not once does a single person utter the word "war." Apparently the “New Middle East” is actually an alternate dimension lacking in shoulder-mounted, surface-to-air, anti-aircraft missile launchers, IEDs, and armed conflict in general.
4. Speaking of explosives, every time we see shots of those four white cars driving in caravan through the desert, I hope that one of them will blow up and this will turn into an entirely different kind of movie. Maybe the kidnappers will send Big a ridiculous beplumed shoe or atrocious hat as proof of life.
5. Remind me when I’m married to occasionally cheat on my husband, so that he’ll buy me jewelry intended to serve as a kind of gaudy choke chain for reminding me that I’m married.
